Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: Jayson King <w@jaysonking.com>
- To: Zimmermann Paul <Paul.Zimmermann@loria.fr>
- Cc: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: bug in polyselect2l.c parameters
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 04:00:09 -0500
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss>
- List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
On 10/01/2012 08:23 AM, Zimmermann Paul wrote:
> Shi, I suggest you discard all q's such that p1*p2*q > m0, i.e. q >
> m0/(p1*p2).
>
> If too expensive to check for each p1, p2, you can simply discard all q's
> such that (2P)^2*q > m0, i.e., q > m0/(4P^2).
I thought that you want to have p_1*p_2*q < m0/P^2, which would mean you
need to discard all q > m0/(4*P^4).
Jayson
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: bug in polyselect2l.c parameters, Jayson King, 10/01/2012
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: bug in polyselect2l.c parameters, Shi Bai, 10/01/2012
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: bug in polyselect2l.c parameters, Zimmermann Paul, 10/01/2012
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: bug in polyselect2l.c parameters, Jayson King, 10/02/2012
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: bug in polyselect2l.c parameters, Zimmermann Paul, 10/02/2012
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: bug in polyselect2l.c parameters, Jayson King, 10/02/2012
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: bug in polyselect2l.c parameters, Zimmermann Paul, 10/01/2012
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: bug in polyselect2l.c parameters, Shi Bai, 10/01/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.