Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cado-nfs - Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Warnings in log file

Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs

List archive

Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Warnings in log file


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Paul Leyland <paul.leyland@gmail.com>
  • To: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Warnings in log file
  • Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 16:39:09 +0100
  • List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/>
  • List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>

On Sun, 2014-08-10 at 15:46 +0100, Paul Leyland wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-08-10 at 15:31 +0100, Paul Leyland wrote:
> > I'm getting lines such as these in the log file:
> >
> > PID24061 2014-08-10 15:17:25,680 Warning:Polynomial Selection (size
> > optimized): Invalid polyselect file
> > '/home/pcl/nums/cado_fact/work/w5_340.upload/w5_340.polyselect1.nu90yb.300000-350000':
> > Invalid key 'm' in line 'm:
> > 539674964626763977967326357598007943067461897751243105983674608872801964377960841257117954800435165509502108662569827240434509583101643506969673222196'
> >
> > Should I be concerned? Does it mean that polynomial finding is going
> > wrong?
> >
> > A larger nip from the log file is given below so that more context can
> > be seen.
> ...
>
> Please hold off dealing with this one for the time being. I think I
> found an issue related to a problem I had with an earlier version of
> CADO-NFS. For a reason I don't now remember polyselect2 and las had to
> be in my $PATH which does *not* include a directory deep in the build
> tree. I'd forgotten to copy the newly built binaries over to ~/bin and
> so the initial run was using an elderly version of polyselect2
>
> I'll mail again if the issue occurs now that I've updated
> ~/bin/polyselect2

Ok, that was the problem. My apologies for the false alarm.


Paul






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page