Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: Zimmermann Paul <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
- To: Cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: [Cado-nfs-discuss] efficiency of CADO-NFS
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:19:40 +0200
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/>
- List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Hi,
we have put on http://cado-nfs.gforge.inria.fr/ a comparison of different
releases on RSA-challenge numbers on the same platform:
Input number CADO-NFS 1.1 CADO-NFS 2.0 CADO-NFS 2.1
RSA-120 100 hours 45.6 hours 43.9 hours
RSA-130 288 hours 231 hours 219 hours
RSA-140 809 hours 614 hours 599 hours
RSA-155 268 days 141 days 123 days
This clearly shows one should use the latest release of CADO-NFS for more
efficiency.
Paul Zimmermann
- [Cado-nfs-discuss] efficiency of CADO-NFS, Zimmermann Paul, 09/29/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.