Discussion related to cado-nfs

[Francois Morain <morain@lix.polytechnique.fr>]

ok. Sounds a good idea. And in this way, I'll save some deep bug
hunting :-)
FM

Le Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 01:21:46PM +0100, Emmanuel Thomé écrivait : 
> you daredevil !
> 
> This would change the ordering of relations, too.
> 
> What if instead we just adhere to what is in the poly file ? I think
> that at this point we can probably get rid of those two #defines
> entirely anyway. So the strategy would be, if we have (as we have now)
> polynomials described by values c0,c1,c2... and Y0,Y1, make them
> polynomials number 1 and 0, respectively -- as is currently the case,
> and if instead we have polynomials of the form f0=12,34,56 and
> f1=67,89,10, make them number 0 and 1 as requested and print relations
> in that order.
> 
> E.
> 
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Francois Morain
> <morain@lix.polytechnique.fr> wrote:
> > thinking about it, for using multiple polynomials in NFS, I'd like to
> > think of polynomials as an array containing {f, g_0 = g, ...,
> > g_{n-1}}. It would be handy to have ALGEBRAIC = 0 and RATIONAL = 1
> > instead of
> >
> > #define RATIONAL_SIDE   0
> > #define ALGEBRAIC_SIDE   1
> >
> > As I understand it, we are now ready to swap these two values?
> >
> > FM
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cado-nfs-discuss mailing list
> > Cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cado-nfs-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Cado-nfs-discuss mailing list
> Cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cado-nfs-discuss
--Fin du message d'origine--

--