Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: Pierrick Gaudry <pierrick.gaudry@loria.fr>
- To: Paul Leyland <paul.leyland@gmail.com>
- Cc: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Cado-days ?
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 20:22:34 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/>
- List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Dear Paul,
> [...]
> I note that ARM systems are now becoming very common, big
> enough and with significant computational performance; they tend to be
> *much* more power-efficient than x86 systems. They also have
> interesting architectural differences. Perhaps this topic could be
> considered for inclusion in the "coding sprints" element?
> [...]
Now cado-nfs compiles and all the checks pass on a Raspberry pi. It
takes ages, though... We'll soon have a pi 2 that should be a bit faster,
with the goal to set it up within our continous integration mechanism.
Porting to this architecture was indeed interesting, and several
nice bugs were found.
Pierrick
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Cado-days ?, Pierrick Gaudry, 03/03/2015
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Cado-days ?, Paul Leyland, 03/07/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.