Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: Francois Morain <morain@lix.polytechnique.fr>
- To: Alexander Kruppa <alexander.kruppa@inria.fr>
- Cc: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] threadpool, etc.
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:28:52 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/>
- List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
at least, this is what my current version of gcc (4.4.6) says. Thanks. F.
Le Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:12:49PM +0100, Alexander Kruppa écrivait :
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Francois Morain" <morain@lix.polytechnique.fr>
> > To: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> > Sent: Wednesday, 25 March, 2015 1:20:11 PM
> > Subject: [Cado-nfs-discuss] threadpool, etc.
> >
> > may I recall that not all of us are using top-brand-new C++ compilers?
> > F.
> >
> > In file included from
> > /mnt/data/morain/cado-dev/cado-nfs/utils/threadpool.cpp:4:
> > /mnt/data/morain/cado-dev/cado-nfs/utils/threadpool.h: In constructor
> > 'mutex::mutex()':
> > /mnt/data/morain/cado-dev/cado-nfs/utils/threadpool.h:44: warning:
> > extended initializer lists only available with -std=c++0x or
> > -std=gnu++0x
>
> Hm, I didn't think the mutex/cv initialiser constants counted as being
> C++11 uniform initialiser syntax. Anyway, should be fixed now.
>
> Alex
--Fin du message d'origine--
--
- [Cado-nfs-discuss] threadpool, etc., Francois Morain, 03/25/2015
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] threadpool, etc., Alexander Kruppa, 03/25/2015
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] threadpool, etc., Francois Morain, 03/25/2015
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] threadpool, etc., Alexander Kruppa, 03/25/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.