Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: paul zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
- To: Robert Pancoast <robertpancoast77@gmail.com>
- Cc: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Timing Comparison for 2.2
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:49:03 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/>
- List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
> Hello
>
> I setup a sequence to execute factor trials. Each build-log is time
> stamped.
> 20151214140429 is the time stamp of a log file. All the logs previously
> attached are for the latest Git version 2.2.0.
then something is wrong. If you use the 2.2.0 release, you should get:
-- Configuring CADO revision 217d477
but you get in cado-nfs-build_bot-20151214140429-hang.txt:
-- Configuring CADO revision 51f6867
thus you are not using the 2.2.0 release.
Paul
- [Cado-nfs-discuss] Timing Comparison for 2.2, ƦOB COASTN, 12/14/2015
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Timing Comparison for 2.2, paul zimmermann, 12/15/2015
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Timing Comparison for 2.2, Robert Pancoast, 12/15/2015
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Timing Comparison for 2.2, paul zimmermann, 12/15/2015
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Timing Comparison for 2.2, Robert Pancoast, 12/15/2015
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Timing Comparison for 2.2, paul zimmermann, 12/15/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.