Discussion related to cado-nfs

[Emmanuel Thomé <Emmanuel.Thome@inria.fr>]

You're giving us the stack trace, but I think that the actual text of the
exception has also been printed. So what in your text output resembles:

    Binary executable file [THE THING I'M INTERESTED IN] not found [...]

?

(and well, yes, did you run "make" ?)

E.

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 10:14:52AM +0100, Paul Zimmermann wrote:
>        Hi,
> 
> >    according to README.dlp, 
> > I am tying to solve 
> > ./cado-nfs.py <p> -dlp -ell <ell> -gfpext 2  should work well, but I got
> > this:
> > 
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >   File "./cado-nfs.py", line 122, in <module>
> >     factors = factorjob.run()
> >   File "./scripts/cadofactor/cadotask.py", line 5429, in run
> >     last_status, last_task = self.run_next_task()
> >   File "./scripts/cadofactor/cadotask.py", line 5504, in run_next_task
> >     return [task.run(), task.title]
> >   File "./scripts/cadofactor/cadotask.py", line 2433, in run
> >     **self.merged_args[0])
> >   File "./scripts/cadofactor/cadoprograms.py", line 705, in __init__
> >     super().__init__(locals(), **kwargs)
> >   File "./scripts/cadofactor/cadoprograms.py", line 416, in __init__
> >     raise Exception("Binary executable file %s not found (did you run
> > \"make\" ?)" % execfile)
> 
> as the error message says, did you run make? If yes, please can you send 
> your
> precise input so that we can try to reproduce the issue?
> 
> > Besides, for DLP in GF(p^k) for small k
> > Polynomial selection and the individual logarithm is needed, but how 
> > should I
> > fit it in the whole program? 
> 
> for the polynomial, you can import it (see scripts/cadofactor/README).
> For the individual logarithm, as said in README.dlp, this has to be
> implemented.
> 
> Paul Zimmermann
> _______________________________________________
> Cado-nfs-discuss mailing list
> Cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> https://lists.gforge.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/cado-nfs-discuss