Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: paul zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
- To: "Xs. X." <zwwynyw@gmail.com>
- Cc: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Likely a bug in DLP for GF(p^2)
- Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 18:19:36 +0200
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/>
- List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Hi,
> I'm solving a DLP problem in GF(p^2) with the polynomial built by myself,
> and the program failed at reconstructlog-dl.
please see the FAQ about DLP in GF(p^2):
https://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/2019-April/001028.html
and README.dlp, especially the last paragraph, which says that DLP in GF(p^2)
should work for ***p = 7 mod 8***. Your p is 3 mod 8.
It is not a bug, just something not implemented (and documented as such).
Best regards,
Paul Zimmermann
- [Cado-nfs-discuss] Likely a bug in DLP for GF(p^2), Xs. X., 05/18/2019
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Likely a bug in DLP for GF(p^2), paul zimmermann, 05/18/2019
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Likely a bug in DLP for GF(p^2), Xs. X., 05/19/2019
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Likely a bug in DLP for GF(p^2), Pierrick Gaudry, 05/19/2019
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Likely a bug in DLP for GF(p^2), Xs. X., 05/19/2019
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Likely a bug in DLP for GF(p^2), Pierrick Gaudry, 05/20/2019
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Likely a bug in DLP for GF(p^2), paul zimmermann, 05/18/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.