Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: Emmanuel Thomé <Emmanuel.Thome@inria.fr>
- To: Ed Hall <ed_ka2fwj@yahoo.com>
- Cc: cado-nfs@inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [cado-nfs] cado-nfs Digest Thu, 23 Dec 2021 (1/1)
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 23:00:43 -0800
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 03:20:43AM +0000, Ed Hall wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> It there a manner to have CADO-NFS issue a 410, closing the clients
> when tasks.sieve.run=false? If not, could a method be added? When
> performing polyselect only, for larger jobs (as well as other
> taskings), the clients keep pinging the server machine after the server
> has exited. My work around for an automated setup with many external
> clients, has been to run a smaller complete job after the polyselect
> has finished. This is not ideal. Thanks.
Yes, this is a good suggestion.
Implementation is trickier than it seems. We're touching on some of the
brittle aspects of the cado-nfs server, here. The server would have to
wait for the clients to ask for work so that it gets a chance to answer
410. Presumably, waiting for (what the server think is) the clients sleep
time could be appropriate.
I may have a try at this, but that won't be immediate.
Best regards,
E.
>
> Sincerely,Ed Hall
- Re: [cado-nfs] cado-nfs Digest Thu, 23 Dec 2021 (1/1), Emmanuel Thomé, 02/01/2022
- Re: [cado-nfs] cado-nfs Digest Thu, 23 Dec 2021 (1/1), Ed Hall, 02/01/2022
- Re: [cado-nfs] cado-nfs Digest Thu, 23 Dec 2021 (1/1), Emmanuel Thomé, 02/09/2022
- Re: [cado-nfs] cado-nfs Digest Thu, 23 Dec 2021 (1/1), Ed Hall, 02/10/2022
- Re: [cado-nfs] cado-nfs Digest Thu, 23 Dec 2021 (1/1), Ed Hall, 02/14/2022
- Re: [cado-nfs] cado-nfs Digest Thu, 23 Dec 2021 (1/1), Emmanuel Thomé, 02/09/2022
- Re: [cado-nfs] cado-nfs Digest Thu, 23 Dec 2021 (1/1), Ed Hall, 02/01/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.