cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] problem with is_simple() for polygon

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] problem with is_simple() for polygon

From: Andreas Fabri <>
To:
Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] problem with is_simple() for polygon
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:00:29 +0100

wrote:

Just a guess. Try:
2/1 5/1
15/10 35/10
3/1 3/1
35/10 4/10

Thank you for solution, it worked... but why doesn't 1.5/1 work but 15/10
work? is it reasonable?

A rational number is defined as the quotient of two integral numbers
and 1.5 doesn't look very integral

Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] problem with is_simple() for polygon, nt_mahmood, 11/15/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] problem with is_simple() for polygon, Andreas Fabri, 11/15/2007
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] problem with is_simple() for polygon, Ophir Setter, 11/15/2007
  - Hidden Vertices in Regular_Triangulation_3, Joshua A Levine, 11/15/2007
    - Re: [cgal-discuss] Hidden Vertices in Regular_Triangulation_3, Monique . Teillaud, 11/16/2007
      - Re: [cgal-discuss] Hidden Vertices in Regular_Triangulation_3, Joshua A Levine, 11/16/2007
        
        Re: [cgal-discuss] Hidden Vertices in Regular_Triangulation_3, Monique . Teillaud, 11/16/2007
        
        Re: [cgal-discuss] Hidden Vertices in Regular_Triangulation_3, Joshua A Levine, 11/16/2007
        
        Re: [cgal-discuss] Hidden Vertices in Regular_Triangulation_3, Monique . Teillaud, 11/19/2007
        
        Re: [cgal-discuss] Hidden Vertices in Regular_Triangulation_3, Mariette Yvinec, 11/19/2007
    - Re: [cgal-discuss] Hidden Vertices in Regular_Triangulation_3, Sylvain Pion, 11/16/2007

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] problem with is_simple() for polygon