Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
Re: [cgal-discuss] open Surface-Meshing from Pointset - resolved for the moment
Chronological Thread
- From: Sven Andres <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] open Surface-Meshing from Pointset - resolved for the moment
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 18:56:14 +0200
- Organization: [project: syntropy] GmbH
Ok, now I found a way to remove the facets that I didn't want - those facets closing the surrounded space.
I just inserted a call to "is_Gabriel" for selection.
I also found another way I could have tried if that would not have worked - 3D-Alpha-Shapes, but because it worked I didn't try...
Maybe when my collegue tried some other point-sets and has any problems with this current solution, or if I should ever have plenty of time and nothing to do with that...
With best regards,
Sven
Sven Andres schrieb:
Hello everybody,
since my first message ("[cgal-discuss] non-convex Objects from Pointset") I did some more reading and trying and I found, that it does not seem to change the shape of the resulting object if I just change the triangulation-method. Maybe the created faces are slightly different, but still the result is a closed model and not the surface I'm looking for.
For those who did not read my first request - I try to turn a set of points (with free orientation in space) into a 3D-Model of the surface described by the points - e.g. just a patch of a spheres outer hull, not a closed object as though it was cut out of a massive sphere. I got to a point where I can extract a set of faces describing the closed object but that is not what I want... A possible way would be to try to project the point-set onto a plane and do 2D-triangulation but we did it like that in the past and we wanted to go away from 2D-triangulation for we got errors on the boundaries with that approach.
My collegue told me he knows about a program (geomagic) using CGAL that offers an "open 3D triangulation" so that you can turn a set of points describing a surface into a non-closed model of the described surface. He suggested that this might work when using another triangulation method or a different geometry-kernel, but I could not find a way to do this yet...
Since yesterday I went away from "triangulation" and read something about ways to handle 3D-surfaces rather than bodies in CGAL.
I read about "envelopes" and "surface_meshing". While surface-meshing seemed like a step into the right direction it looks like it cannot be used on a free set of points - without a complete description of the surface, or at least one giving the possibility to interpolate between given values.
So here I go again. Can anybody give me a hint how to turn any set of points measured from a surface into a set of faces describing the surface?
Is it possible with CGALs "surface-meshing" or do I need to go a different way?
Any help is absolutely appreciated.
With best regards,
Sven Andres
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.15/1426 - Release Date: 10.05.2008 11:12
begin:vcard fn:Sven Andres n:Andres;Sven org:[project: syntropy] GmbH adr:;;Mozartstr. 5;Magdeburg;Sachsen-Anhalt;D-39106;Deutschland / Germany email;internet: title:research engineer, dipl.-ing. tel;work:+49 (0) 391 544 11 52 tel;fax:+49 (0) 391 544 12 23 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.project-syntropy.de version:2.1 end:vcard
- [cgal-discuss] open Surface-Meshing from Pointset, Sven Andres, 05/11/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] open Surface-Meshing from Pointset - resolved for the moment, Sven Andres, 05/13/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] open Surface-Meshing from Pointset - resolved for the moment, Santosh Tiwari, 05/13/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] open Surface-Meshing from Pointset - resolved for the moment, Sven Andres, 05/13/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.