Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] Random class

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] Random class


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Bo Schwarzstein" <>
  • To: <>
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Random class
  • Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:25:01 +0800
  • Importance: Normal

GSL(GNU Scientific Library) provides a lot of classical random generators and quasi monte carlo sequences generators. The boost library also owns random generators, it's easy to use.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Sylvain Pion"
<>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:14 PM
To:
<>
Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Random class

Julien Demouth a �crit :
Hi all,

Maybe it is a question which has already been raised (I've seen no sign of this in the archive of the list) but why does the CGAL::Random documentation page differ from its implementation ?

Is there any plan of designing a "better" Random class ?

I would say the plan will be to try to switch to the random generators
provided by C++0x (the next C++ standard). I know our random generators
have some issues.

--
Sylvain Pion
INRIA Sophia-Antipolis
Geometrica Project-Team
CGAL, http://cgal.org/





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page