Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: "Bo Schwarzstein" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Random class
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:25:01 +0800
- Importance: Normal
GSL(GNU Scientific Library) provides a lot of classical random generators and quasi monte carlo sequences generators. The boost library also owns random generators, it's easy to use.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Sylvain Pion"
<>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:14 PM
To:
<>
Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Random class
Julien Demouth a �crit :
Hi all,
Maybe it is a question which has already been raised (I've seen no sign of this in the archive of the list) but why does the CGAL::Random documentation page differ from its implementation ?
Is there any plan of designing a "better" Random class ?
I would say the plan will be to try to switch to the random generators
provided by C++0x (the next C++ standard). I know our random generators
have some issues.
--
Sylvain Pion
INRIA Sophia-Antipolis
Geometrica Project-Team
CGAL, http://cgal.org/
- [cgal-discuss] Random class, Julien Demouth, 07/22/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Random class, Sylvain Pion, 07/22/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Random class, Bo Schwarzstein, 07/23/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Random class, Bernd Gaertner, 07/22/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Random class, Julien Demouth, 07/23/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Random class, Sylvain Pion, 07/22/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.