Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL compilation using Intel C++ compiler

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL compilation using Intel C++ compiler


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Alejandro Aragon <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL compilation using Intel C++ compiler
  • Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:35:59 -0600
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=kZODpUyzhc8L4WRXn3fpfwBq+EPZcYHCZJX0jNXkKs6A5W+XSKVROFZ8dY3U1ZfqJX yNkBUokFq9CoIBt83/EfaZWaPgQh5N4kM+r4RgrW9nlpY46ZsMQ+EMzw7v2vK4EvqRHq m+AZypxNAHuWplqLwDKFpszgc/p+E19cWQZRY=

Thanks for replying. Since you compiled the library with the Intel compiler, I was wondering if you noticed any advantages than just compiling with g++.

aa

On Feb 17, 2009, at 11:21 AM,
<>
wrote:

I had the same issue that I think you are experiencing. The problem with using
the intel c++ 10.1 is a naming issue in a couple of files.
When you compile you will get an error. got to that file at that line. You'll
see a compiler if statement, that says something along the the lines of "If
intel.... else ...". This worked for previous version of intel c++ but not for
10.1, which is not supported. The solution is to eliminate the if statement and
just keep the part not referring to intel.
This issue arises only in a few locations so it's not a major pain to fix. I've
done this a while ago so I don't remember the exact details.
I'm pretty sure this doesn't alter anything in the actual algorithms, but if
you do so, do it at your own risk. I'm in no way an expert in CGAL.

Jean-Noel
--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page