Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Sylvain Pion <>
- To:
- Cc: Bernd Gaertner <>
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] which number types are actually exact?
- Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 10:53:59 +0200
Benoit Hudson a écrit :
The documentation for Gmpzf indicates that it's exact. However, it
seems to provide a division operation. This tripped me up when I used
it with some code that uses division.
Indeed, Gmpzf should probably not define operator/ (like MP_Float).
Which types can I rely on to refuse to compile inexact operations?
It depends what you want to do exactly.
You can also write wrappers to catch these problems.
--
Sylvain Pion
INRIA Sophia-Antipolis
Geometrica Project-Team
CGAL, http://cgal.org/
- [cgal-discuss] which number types are actually exact?, Benoit Hudson, 05/01/2009
- Re: [cgal-discuss] which number types are actually exact?, Sylvain Pion, 05/02/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.