Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Edoardo Milotti <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] two questions on future CGAL developments
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 22:12:47 +0200
I have tried to recompile everything making sure of setting
source /opt/intel/Compiler/11.1/088/bin/iccvars.sh intel64
and of using the Intel compiled library in the examples, but still I had no
success with the Intel compiler 11.1/088: the examples abort with
segmentation fault. I reinstalled everything, but still it did not work. I
shall try to find out what is wrong and if I do, I shall report it.
Greetings,
Edoardo
On 05/mag/2010, at 20.46, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory) wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 May 2010 20:27:57 Edoardo Milotti wrote:
>>> I can answer to that question: the Intel Compiler (versions 11.0 and
>>> 11.1) is tested by CGAL daily testsuite. You must make sure the
>>> following compilation
>>>
>>> flags are used:
>>> -D_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_FP_MACROS_DYNAMIC=1 -fp-model strict -diag-disable
>>> 980
>>>
>>> (Probably only -fp-model strict is important, and the other flags are
>>> there to silent some warnings.)
>>>
>>> *However*, the compilation flag -strict-ansi of the Intel Compiler is
>>> (not yet) supported. I have added that setup (with -strict-ansi), and
>>> things are going better and better. Probably Intel Compiler 11.1 with
>>> -strict-ansi will be supported (or almost supported) by CGAL-3.7.
>>>
>>> Can you give use an example of the error log you get?
>>
>> I do not use the -strict-ansi flag, while I always set -fp-model strict.
>>
>> I have tried to build the libraries with
>>
>> cmake -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=/opt/intel/Compiler/11.1/088/bin/intel64/icc
>> -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/opt/intel/Compiler/11.1/088/bin/intel64/icpc
>> -DWITH_examples=true
>
> The version I test is /opt/intel/Compiler/11.1/059/bin/intel64/icpc (ie
> build
> version 059 instead of 088), but I doubt it can make any difference.
>
> Do you call the following command before the compilation?
>
> source /opt/intel/Compiler/11.1/088/bin/iccvars.sh intel64
>
>> and then make. The libraries build (with some warnings that tell me there
>> are duplicate libraries), but when I try to run the examples I always get
>> "segmentation error".
>
> I cannot reproduce that behavior with CGAL-3.6. I have compiled the
> libraries
> with icpc (11.1/059) as well as, for example, examples/Triangulation_3/,
> and
> there examples ran fine.
>
>> Now I am using the libraries built by gcc 4.5.
>
> Oops, no!! The generated file include/CGAL/compiler_config.h is very
> compiler-
> dependent.
>
>> When I try to compile the program that calls CGAL with icpc I get a list of
>> error messages like this:
>>
>>
>> ********************
>>
>> /CG_Software/CGAL-3.6/CGAL-3.6/include/CGAL/Triangulation_ds_cell_base_3.h(
>> 50): error: only "()" is allowed as initializer for array member
>> "CGAL::Triangulation_ds_cell_base_3<TDS>::V"
>>
>> : V((Vertex_handle[4]) {v0, v1, v2, v3} ) {}
>>
>> ^
>> detected during:
>
> Have a look at the line 50 of the file
> CGAL-3.6/include/CGAL/Triangulation_ds_cell_base_3.h
>
> You will see that that line depends on the macro
> CGAL_CFG_ARRAY_MEMBER_INITIALIZATION_BUG, which is defined in
> <CGAL/compiler-
> config.h>, and that file is created during the configuration of CGAL
> libraries.
>
> Here, you are trying to compile some CGAL program with the Intel Compiler,
> using a feature that is available only with g++ (actually it is not a
> "bug",
> but a language extension specific to g++).
>
> --
> Laurent Rineau, PhD
> R&D Engineer at GeometryFactory http://www.geometryfactory.com/
> Release Manager of the CGAL Project http://www.cgal.org/
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
> To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
> https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
>
- [cgal-discuss] two questions on future CGAL developments, Edoardo Milotti, 05/05/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] two questions on future CGAL developments, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 05/05/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] two questions on future CGAL developments, Edoardo Milotti, 05/05/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] two questions on future CGAL developments, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 05/05/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] two questions on future CGAL developments, Edoardo Milotti, 05/06/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] two questions on future CGAL developments, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 05/05/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] two questions on future CGAL developments, Edoardo Milotti, 05/05/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] two questions on future CGAL developments, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 05/05/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.