Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Dominik Szczerba <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] 3d mesh generation
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 21:23:32 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=OOHG7CIQNNo+QWOnaoqVAFhS+JUuVG548lkZPl9Hq7So6ztrzpdvgAeXQ57NDcJZ3Z oYpbIe3iuasW+KlsrxffQtwFEZkoiIWGQQ97fVLyXtWON7AWpfuE894HCR0S6QiQ5s03 EQ2p1Tx3/2ivqnpOQEpB/ia780nBwZUGCbytA=
Smoothing labeled medical image data is not straight forward.
I have similar problems. They are somewhat resolved by requesting
bigger elements, but then some smaller features inside are lost...
Would be very helpful to get some examples how the mesh
optimization/smoothing parameters affect the outcomes.
Best regards,
Dominik
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Michal Parusinski
<>
wrote:
> I haven't really looked I am just suggesting ideas. You can smooth the
> mesh or you can smooth the original image. CGAL offers options for
> smoothing when generating 3d mesh generation, but it depends what kind
> of smoothing you want to get :
>
> http://www.cgal.org/Manual/latest/doc_html/cgal_manual/Mesh_3/Chapter_main.html
>
> You can also try a Laplacian smoothing on the resulting mesh. However
> I never implemented something like that myself, so I can't help in
> doing so. And you can also try a Gaussian smoothing on the original
> image.
>
> On 9 September 2010 14:32, Hulusi Acikgoz
> <>
> wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply,
>>
>> I don't know how to do that,
>> This a .ima file that I've converted to analyze file.
>> Do you think that the original image is not enough smooth
>>
>>
>> 2010/9/9 Michal Parusinski
>> <>
>>>
>>> Can you try to smooth the image before giving it to CGAL meshing?
>>>
>>> On 9 September 2010 14:17, Hulusi
>>> <>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I am using the mesh_3D_image to have a 3D tetrahedral mesh from a
>>> > segmented
>>> > 3D image. The size of the image is 150x256x256 and the size of the
>>> > woxels is
>>> > 1.047mm x 1.047mm x 1mm.
>>> > The mesh criteria are (30;3;3) for the facets and (3;5) for the mesh
>>> > cells.
>>> >
>>> > Howewer, I have a problem of smoothness of the surface (see attached
>>> > file).
>>> >
>>> > Do you have any idea about this?
>>> >
>>> > http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/file/n2532835/tete_Enfant.png
>>> > --
>>> > View this message in context:
>>> > http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/3d-mesh-generation-tp2532835p2532835.html
>>> > Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
>>> > To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
>>> > https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
>>> To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
>>> https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
> To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
> https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
>
>
- [cgal-discuss] 3d mesh generation, Hulusi, 09/09/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] 3d mesh generation, Michal Parusinski, 09/09/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] 3d mesh generation, Hulusi Acikgoz, 09/09/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] 3d mesh generation, Michal Parusinski, 09/09/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] 3d mesh generation, Dominik Szczerba, 09/09/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] 3d mesh generation, Michal Parusinski, 09/09/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] 3d mesh generation, Hulusi Acikgoz, 09/09/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] 3d mesh generation, Michal Parusinski, 09/09/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.