Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Eric Berberich <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Gmpfi: a black hole for memory?
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:57:39 +0100
Marc Glisse wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Alexander Kobel wrote:
Hi, all,
Hello.
I suspect that the CGAL::Gmpfi interval number type is severely leaking memory.
So it is.
Does using -DCGAL_GMPFR_NO_REFCOUNT reduce the leaking? (Note that it isn't a real fix, it may just work around some of the leaky code paths)
Can we add this parameter meter to the mpfi detection in CMake?
eriC
- [cgal-discuss] Gmpfi: a black hole for memory?, Alexander Kobel, 12/15/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Gmpfi: a black hole for memory?, Marc Glisse, 12/15/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Gmpfi: a black hole for memory?, Alexander Kobel, 12/15/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Gmpfi: a black hole for memory?, Marc Glisse, 12/15/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Gmpfi: a black hole for memory?, Eric Berberich, 12/15/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Gmpfi: a black hole for memory?, Alexander Kobel, 12/15/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Gmpfi: a black hole for memory?, Marc Glisse, 12/15/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.