Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] Possible bug (Nef_polyhedron_3 stream)

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] Possible bug (Nef_polyhedron_3 stream)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Possible bug (Nef_polyhedron_3 stream)
  • Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:31:34 +0100
  • Organization: GeometryFactory

On 11/19/2012 11:04 AM, Noel Warren wrote:
I am working with minkowski sums so EPEC kernel is my only option (I
believe).
It should work fine (even if slower).

Sebastien.

If you want me to run a "hello tetrahedron" example just to
compare the two kernels let me know. I have seen no evidence of EPEC
using doubles as a default in its out stream. It just seems that when
the integers are too big it decides to convert them to double instead of
printing all the characters representing the integer.

I had to google IIRC. I thought it was a kernel or number format of
some sort :D


2012/11/19 Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)
<
<mailto:>>

Hi Noel,

Could you try with CGAL::Simple_cartesian<CGAL::__Gmpq> ?

The stream operator with EPEC kernel is using to_double on the
coordinates IIRC.

Sebastien.


On 11/19/2012 09:50 AM, Noel Warren wrote:

I'm using the Exact_predicates_exact___constructions kernel to
construct
my Nef polyhedra and I believe I've run into a bug. The Nef
seems to
have no problem being stringified. When I try to rebuild the
nef with
the string it will often fail.

I try a simple tetrahedron with points
(0,0,0)(1,0,0)(0,1,0)(0,0,1) and
everything works fine. But if I change the last point to have a
value
of (0,0,1.1) it fails. You might think that the problem has
something
to do with floats, but it doesn't. 1.5 works fine as does 0.75

As you probably know, the points are represented as a quotient
with both
the numerator and denominator being integers. The problem seems
to be
that when these integers (gmpz) are being output with the <<
operator
they get abbreviated when too long (eg: 2.47698e+15). This not only
leads to a loss in precision but means the file can not be read,
as gmpz
cannot parse the integer in that format. Here is my failing
tetrahedron
example (see fourth point) ...

Selective Nef Complex
standard
vertices 4
halfedges 12
facets 8
volumes 2
shalfedges 24
shalfloops 0
sfaces 8
0 { 0 2, 0 5, 0 1, -2 | 0 0 0 1 } 1
1 { 3 5, 6 11, 2 3, -2 | 1 0 0 1 } 1
2 { 6 8, 12 17, 4 5, -2 | 0 1 0 1 } 1
3 { 9 11, 18 23, 6 7, -2 | 0 0 2.47698e+15 2.2518e+15 } 1
0 { 4, 0, 0 0 | 1 0 0 1 } 1
1 { 6, 0, 0 1 | 0 1 0 1 } 1
2 { 9, 0, 0 3 | 0 0 1 1 } 1
3 { 7, 1, 0 6 | -1 1 0 1 } 1
4 { 0, 1, 0 7 | -1 0 0 1 } 1
5 { 11, 1, 0 9 | -2.2518e+15 0 2.47698e+15 1 } 1
6 { 1, 2, 0 12 | 0 -1 0 1 } 1
7 { 3, 2, 0 13 | 1 -1 0 1 } 1
8 { 10, 2, 0 15 | 0 -2.2518e+15 2.47698e+15 1 } 1
9 { 2, 3, 0 18 | 0 0 -1 1 } 1
10 { 8, 3, 0 19 | 0 2.2518e+15 -2.47698e+15 1 } 1
11 { 5, 3, 0 21 | 2.2518e+15 0 -2.47698e+15 1 } 1
0 { 1, 4 , , 0 | 0 -1 0 0 } 1
1 { 0, 5 , , 1 | 0 1 0 0 } 1
2 { 3, 20 , , 0 | 2.47698e+15 2.47698e+15 2.2518e+15
-2.47698e+15 } 1
3 { 2, 21 , , 1 | -2.47698e+15 -2.47698e+15 -2.2518e+15
2.47698e+15 } 1
4 { 5, 2 , , 0 | -1 0 0 0 } 1
5 { 4, 3 , , 1 | 1 0 0 0 } 1
6 { 7, 0 , , 0 | 0 0 -1 0 } 1
7 { 6, 1 , , 1 | 0 0 1 0 } 1
0 { 0 } 0
1 { 1 } 1
0 { 1, 4, 2, 0, 1, 6, 12, 6 | 0 0 1 0 } 1
1 { 0, 3, 5, 1, 0, 13, 7, 7 | 0 0 -1 0 } 1
2 { 3, 0, 4, 1, 1, 16, 18, 4 | 1 0 0 0 } 1
3 { 2, 5, 1, 2, 0, 19, 17, 5 | -1 0 0 0 } 1
4 { 5, 2, 0, 2, 1, 22, 8, 0 | 0 1 0 0 } 1
5 { 4, 1, 3, 0, 0, 9, 23, 1 | 0 -1 0 0 } 1
6 { 7, 10, 8, 3, 3, 12, 0, 6 | 0 0 1 0 } 1
7 { 6, 9, 11, 4, 2, 1, 13, 7 | 0 0 -1 0 } 1
8 { 9, 6, 10, 4, 3, 4, 22, 0 | 0 1 0 0 } 1
9 { 8, 11, 7, 5, 2, 23, 5, 1 | 0 -1 0 0 } 1
10 { 11, 8, 6, 5, 3, 20, 14, 2 | -2.47698e+15 -2.47698e+15
-2.2518e+15 0 } 1
11 { 10, 7, 9, 3, 2, 15, 21, 3 | 2.47698e+15 2.47698e+15
2.2518e+15 0 } 1
12 { 13, 16, 14, 6, 5, 0, 6, 6 | 0 0 1 0 } 1
13 { 12, 15, 17, 7, 4, 7, 1, 7 | 0 0 -1 0 } 1
14 { 15, 12, 16, 7, 5, 10, 20, 2 | -2.47698e+15 -2.47698e+15
-2.2518e+15
0 } 1
15 { 14, 17, 13, 8, 4, 21, 11, 3 | 2.47698e+15 2.47698e+15
2.2518e+15 0 } 1
16 { 17, 14, 12, 8, 5, 18, 2, 4 | 1 0 0 0 } 1
17 { 16, 13, 15, 6, 4, 3, 19, 5 | -1 0 0 0 } 1
18 { 19, 22, 20, 9, 7, 2, 16, 4 | 1 0 0 0 } 1
19 { 18, 21, 23, 10, 6, 17, 3, 5 | -1 0 0 0 } 1
20 { 21, 18, 22, 10, 7, 14, 10, 2 | -2.47698e+15 -2.47698e+15
-2.2518e+15 0 } 1
21 { 20, 23, 19, 11, 6, 11, 15, 3 | 2.47698e+15 2.47698e+15
2.2518e+15 0 } 1
22 { 23, 20, 18, 11, 7, 8, 4, 0 | 0 1 0 0 } 1
23 { 22, 19, 21, 9, 6, 5, 9, 1 | 0 -1 0 0 } 1
0 { 0, 1 , , , 0 } 0
1 { 0, 0 , , , 1 } 1
2 { 1, 7 , , , 0 } 0
3 { 1, 6 , , , 1 } 1
4 { 2, 13 , , , 0 } 0
5 { 2, 12 , , , 1 } 1
6 { 3, 19 , , , 0 } 0
7 { 3, 18 , , , 1 } 1
/* end Selective Nef complex */



--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/__info/cgal-discuss
<https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/info/cgal-discuss>







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page