Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Bernd Gärtner <>
- To: <>
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Bug report: Polytope_distance_d package
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:58:04 +0200
On 8/9/13 11:44 AM, jdumas wrote:
Hi,You're right, I had overlooked this.
Sorry to bump this thread again after a thousand years, but after reading
the doc and having had a glance at the source code, it seems that there's
currently no way to set the pricing stategy for the solver used by the
Polytope_distance_d class. It falls back on either QP_PARTIAL_DANTZIG or
QP_PARTIAL_FILTERED_DANTZIG.
I'm working on a fix for the next release. For now, simply replace QP_PARTIAL_DANTZIG by QP_BLAND in the file Polytope_distance_d.h. If you're calling the package as in the example file polytope_distance_d.cpp (full exact computations), this should solve the issue. If you call it as in polytope_distance_d_fast_exact.cpp (filtered computations), you should switch to full exact computations.
Could you provide a patch to pass Quadratic_program_options to the solver?
Best,
Bernd.
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Bug report: Polytope_distance_d package, jdumas, 08/09/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Bug report: Polytope_distance_d package, Bernd Gärtner, 08/13/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.