Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: A valid Polyhedron_3 surface

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: A valid Polyhedron_3 surface


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Laurent Rineau (CGAL/GeometryFactory)" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: A valid Polyhedron_3 surface
  • Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 10:15:05 +0200
  • Organization: GeometryFactory

Le vendredi 30 août 2013 08:54:59 gupta61 a écrit :
> Thanks Laurent.
>
> So if I force the to create the polyhedron with points and their
> connectivities such that this property does not hold, I should get an error.
> Right?

Right.

> I am having this issue with one of the surface where the normals are not
> consistent but when I am asking if the Polyhedron_3 is valid, I am getting
> the answer that yes the normals are valid. Another thing is I tried to
> recreate this in a smaller problem (less than 10 facets) but no luck. So is
> it ok if I can send you the file with nodal coordinates and connectivities
> and if you can check if you are getting the same result? If you have any
> preference for the file format, I can dump my data in that particular
> format. Let me know.

The OFF format is the easiest to use with CGAL.

Please do not attach your file to a mail, but post it to a public web service.

--
Laurent Rineau, PhD
R&D Engineer at GeometryFactory http://www.geometryfactory.com/
Release Manager of the CGAL Project http://www.cgal.org/



  • Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: A valid Polyhedron_3 surface, Laurent Rineau (CGAL/GeometryFactory), 09/02/2013

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page