Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Mariette Yvinec <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Alpha_Shapes_3 Bunny
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:30:13 +0100
Plain alpha_shapes is not a very good reconstruction method. The "optimal" alpha-value is the smallest alpha value that will give a single connected components including all data points. It might not be the best one to see the Bunny feature appear. You might try a few others alpha values, just to be convinced things are working as they should. Le 25/11/13 20:28, Claudia Werner a
écrit :
Dear all, I am working on Alpha_Shapes for triangulating a point cloud. As a first example I tried the example "Alpha_shapes_3/ex_alpha_shapes_3.cpp" (http://doc.cgal.org/latest/Alpha_shapes_3/Alpha_shapes_3_2ex_alpha_shapes_3_8cpp-example.html) and wrote the result to an off-File as descirbed here:http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15905833/saving-cgal-alpha-shape-surface-mesh. Displaying the result with MeshLab (using the off-file), I was wondering about the result (see attached picture). Has anybody an idea why I don't get a better result? As in the example I used the optimal alpha. I also attached the cpp-file. Best Regards and thanks for your help, Claudia -- Mariette Yvinec Geometrica project team INRIA Sophia-Antipolis |
- [cgal-discuss] Alpha_Shapes_3 Bunny, Claudia Werner, 11/25/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Alpha_Shapes_3 Bunny, Mariette Yvinec, 11/26/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Alpha_Shapes_3 Bunny, Daniel Duque, 11/26/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Alpha_Shapes_3 Bunny, Mariette Yvinec, 11/26/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.