Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] Linear cell complex: Explicit degeneracy removal required?

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] Linear cell complex: Explicit degeneracy removal required?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Monique Teillaud <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Linear cell complex: Explicit degeneracy removal required?
  • Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 11:55:21 +0200

Hi,

The symbolic perturbation is used when "the" Delaunay triangulation is not uniquely defined. It allows to make consistent decisions and provide one of the possible triangulations, in a deterministic way.

I don't know what you mean by "degeneracy removal".
The symbolic perturbation does not modify your input points, so it does not remove the degeneracy. If your points are cospherical, then they stay cospherical.

--
Monique Teillaud
http://www.loria.fr/~teillaud/
INRIA Nancy - Grand Est, LORIA
Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et Automatique

Le 01/05/15 10:13, Pranav a écrit :
Hi,

I am using /Delaunay_triangulation_3/ to compute Delaunay triangulation of a
point set having atleast one set of 5 co-spherical points. I then import it
to Linear cell complex using /import_from_triangulation_3/. CGAL
documentation(for Delaunay triangulation package) states that this
degenerate condition is dealt using symbolic perturbation approach which
symbolically perturbs the input vertices.

I want to know if in my problem I want to ensure point set in the Linear
cell complex must not have any degeneracies, do I need to explicitly
implement a degeneracy removal technique for Linear cell complex after
calling /import_from_triangulation_3/?



--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Linear-cell-complex-Explicit-degeneracy-removal-required-tp4660777.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page