CGAL users discussion list

[Pranav <>]

Guillaume Damiand wrote
> There is perhaps a problem during the copy of the LCC regarding the 
> mark. I will have a look of this problem...

Should I open an issue on this problem on Github?


Guillaume Damiand wrote
> However it is a very bad idea to pass lcc by value because it leads to a 
> full copy/destruction for each call...

Thanks for suggesting this, I am now passing lcc as /const LCC &/ in
argument.



--
View this message in context: 
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Combinatorial-map-assertion-error-is-whole-orbit-unmarked-tp4660851p4660869.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.