Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Scherrer Daniel <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: [cgal-discuss] dD Delaunay Triangulation
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:32:32 +0200
- Accept-language: en-US, de-CH
- Acceptlanguage: en-US, de-CH
- Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=Pass ; spf=None
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:HcFzcRIbDTQfaXGnGNmcpTZWNBhigK39O0sv0rFitYgULf3xwZ3uMQTl6Ol3ixeRBMOAu64C27Cd6/qocFdDyKjCmUhKSIZLWR4BhJdetC0bK+nBN3fGKuX3ZTcxBsVIWQwt1Xi6NU9IBJS2PAWK8TWM5DIfUi/yKRBybrysXNWC04LnjavqodX6WEZhunmUWftKNhK4rAHc5IE9oLBJDeIP8CbPuWZCYO9MxGlldhq5lhf44dqsrtY4q3wD86Fpy8kVG671dqB9Qb1DByk9KEg04tfqvF/NV0HHsnATW2FTnhtTCBXe9zn7WI3wu230rLwu9jOdOJjNRrA5Qy6v9e9HQRnphSNPYxIw9mDajopLh6JWugisvTRkyJWSa4HDZ6k2Rb/UYd5PHTkJZc1WTSEUWo4=
Hello
When delaunay triangulating in 6D I get much more simplices/full-cells than I would expect. For 3256 vertices there result 2692278 full-cells. I would imagine that the number of full-cells should be about the same as the number of simplices, regardless of the number of dimensions. Although I find it hard to imagine things in 6D ;) Is there an explanation for the large number of simplices?
Regards, Daniel
|
- [cgal-discuss] dD Delaunay Triangulation, Scherrer Daniel, 10/12/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] dD Delaunay Triangulation, Olivier Devillers, 10/12/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] dD Delaunay Triangulation, Adam Getchell, 10/12/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] dD Delaunay Triangulation, Olivier Devillers, 10/12/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.