Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] How to do 3D constrained Delaunay triangulation using CGAL

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] How to do 3D constrained Delaunay triangulation using CGAL


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Olivier Devillers <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] How to do 3D constrained Delaunay triangulation using CGAL
  • Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:43:39 +0100



Le 29/10/15 18:30, 郑银河 a écrit :
That is exactly what I think yesterday.
However, In order to use the meshing packages, I should construct the
boundary mesh of the domain, which is pretty difficult because the
boundary mesh may contain nonmainfold edges.
I am not a specialist of mesh but the doc say that there is no need to be manifold

3D Mesh Generation

Pierre Alliez, Clément Jamin, Laurent Rineau, Stéphane Tayeb, Jane Tournois, Mariette Yvinec
This package is devoted to the generation of isotropic simplicial meshes discretizing 3D domains. The domain to be meshed is a region of 3D space that has to be bounded. The region may be connected or composed of multiple components and/or subdivided in several subdomains. The domain is input as an oracle able to answer queries, of a few different types, on the domain. Boundary and subdivision surfaces are either smooth or piecewise smooth surfaces, formed with planar or curved surface patches. Surfaces may exhibit 1-dimensional features (e.g. crease edges) and 0-dimensional features (e.g. singular points as corners tips, cusps or darts), that have to be fairly approximated in the mesh. Optionally, the algorithms support multi-core shared-memory architectures to take advantage of available parallelism.

...

1.1 Input Domain

The domain to be meshed is assumed to be bounded and representable as a pure 3D complex. A 3D complex is a set of faces with dimension 0, 1, 2 and 3 such that all faces are pairwise interior disjoint, and the boundary of each face of the complex is the union of faces of the complex. The 3D complex is pure, meaning that each face is included in a face of dimension 3, so that the complex is entirely described by the set of its 3D faces and their subfaces. However the 3D complex needs not be connected. The set of faces with dimension lower or equal than 2 forms a 2D subcomplex which needs not be manifold, neither pure, nor connected: some 3D faces may have dangling 2D or 1D faces in their boundary faces.


JPEG image




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page