Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] LGPL questions

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] LGPL questions


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Patric Schmitz <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] LGPL questions
  • Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:45:05 +0100
  • Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=Pass ; spf=Pass ; spf=None
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:k3vONhC7Z8H/bGgHLIlpUyQJP3N1i/DPJgcQr6AfoPdwSP74oMbcNUDSrc9gkEXOFd2CrakU1KyN7eu8BSQp2tWojjMrSNR0TRgLiMEbzUQLIfWuLgnFFsPsdDEwB89YVVVorDmROElRH9viNRWJ+iXhpQAbFhi3DwdpPOO9QteU1JTokbvssMGPKyxzxxODIppKZC2sqgvQssREyaBDEY0WjiXzn31TZu5NznlpL1/A1zz158O34YIxu38I46FppIZ8VvDxcK08CLBZFz87KHsd5cvxtBCFQxHcyGEbVzAumwZSAgON1xr6W5btoGOuvPh+gHbDZOX/SrRyUjOnufQ4ACT0gTsKYmZquFrcjdZ92fpW

On 02/12/2016 01:12 PM, Maria Dubrovskaya wrote:
> the question is still not about LGPL'd library code itself, but
> about my own code. Is the person who created not just another
> modification, but an _official_ improvement (the last official
> library version) still responsible for making sure it works
> correctly with my application or I must do it myself in this case?

Obviously not, how could it be? 1. The person does not know your
code, 2. Then it would not be possible ever to introduce any
not-backward-compatible changes in a library API.

Your code makes use of a particular version of a library. If
there is a newer non-API-compatible version of the library that
you want to make use of, the porting effort is of course on your
part. However noone forces you to use the newer version.

In case you are worried about the version your software works
with becomes unavailable, you might package it alongside your
software. Keep in mind that you need to supply the sources to the
library in case you provide precompiled versions. For details see
the license text, the GPL FAQ, and when in doubt a lawyer.

Best,
Patric



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page