Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Andreas Fabri <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] C++ Standard
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:02:42 +0200
- Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=None ; spf=None
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:MrlxVx2VsWmwejtqsmDT+DRfVm0co7zxezQtwd8ZseIWL/ad9pjvdHbS+e9qxAeQG9mDtrQc06L/iOPJYSQ4+5GPsXQPItRndiQuroEopTEmG9OPEkbhLfTnPGQQFcVGU0J5rTngaRAGUMnxaEfPrXKs8DUcBgvwNRZvJuTyB4Xek9m72/q99pHPYwhEniaxba9vJxiqsAvdsdUbj5F/Iagr0BvJpXVIe+VSxWx2IF+Yggjx6MSt8pN96ipco/0u+dJOXqX8ZKQ4UKdXDC86PGAv5c3krgfMQA2S7XYBSGoWkx5IAw/Y7BHmW5r6ryX3uvZh1CScIMb7S60/Vza/4KdxUBLmlTkJNzA5/m/UhMJ/gq1UrxC9qBFk2YHYfJuYOeBicq7Tf94XQ3dKUMZLVyxGB4Oxd5cCD+wcMuZCsYbyvUAOpga+Cwa2H+zv0D5IjWLx0KIg1eQuDBvG0xI6ENIVqnjUos/6O7wIUeC016TIwivMb/RT2Tjj9IjIaBAgof+WUr1sbcrRzlMvFgPfglqMrozlOiqY2+IQuGaY9+ptTe2ihm89pw1svjSixt0gh4jUio4P11zJ+iF0zJ4xKNGkUkJ2Yt+pHIFNuyyeKYd6WN4uTmF2tCs817YIo4S0fDIQx5Qi3xPfa+KIc4yP4h/7VuudOzJ4hHV4dL+9hRu+602gxff9VsmwyVpKqTdFksXWunAKyRzT6tKLSv1j8Ue9wTqP1gbT5f9YIU0smqfWKoQtzqMsmpcTq0jOHzL6lF/rgKKZckgo4u2o5P7mYrXiqJ+cLYh0igTmP6s0nMywHP44PRYUUGiA4+i82qfs8lbjQLVLlfA2nbfWsJffJcsFuq65GQ9U0og55BmjEzem184YnHkdIF1ZfxKHipDlO0vSL/DgEfe/n1OsnS93yPDJJLLhBozBIWXCkLf6Ybl99lVcyBEowNBE55NUD6kBL+jpVk/wstzYFB45PBauz+bpEtUunr8ZDGmAC6vcPKLJukKT/couJfONbckbomXTMf8gstfogWU0kERVU6Cjx5pfPHm+Eu5rKl7fb3PmmNYpHmoNuwciVv3kgVaeViRCIX21WvRvtXkAFIu6ANKbFciWi7ub0XLjR8wEViV9ElmJVEzQWcCBUvYIZjiVJ5U4wDMJUr2sV5Uw2xilqAjg2vxsKe+GonRE56Km78B84qjorT937SZ9VZ3P3GyKSmxohHIGTjQq27pu50d6zwXbiPUqs7ljDdVWoshxfEI6OJrblbIoVJb3XVueIZGMQVeiB9K7HXc2UNJ3xdISMR5w
It's always a question of balance to find. The switch to C++11
will come soon, Also there are more users than stopped-to-participants, and they
are happy Best, Andreas On 6/7/2018 10:49 AM, Raphael Grimm
wrote:
Hi,
it is the second reason. Though i can understand why libraries tend to stick to c++03 to prevent breaking stuff, I do not know how many people still use a compiler without c++11 support. This also stops some developers (e.g. me) to participate working on a library since all features have to be working for old c++ standards and you have to be careful not to break for these old versions. Furthermore the library can't benefit from new features (or has to add a lot of #if ). This makes the code harder to read and understand. Since this library has breaking changes in new versions, I see no problem in requiring a slightly newer c++ standard (c++11 is around 7 years old). Best Regards, Raphael On 06.06.2018 17:29, Andreas Fabri wrote:
-- Andreas Fabri, PhD Chief Officer, GeometryFactory Editor, The CGAL Project phone: +33.492.954.912 skype: andreas.fabri |
- [cgal-discuss] C++ Standard, Raphael Grimm, 06/05/2018
- Re: [cgal-discuss] C++ Standard, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 06/06/2018
- Re: [cgal-discuss] C++ Standard, Andreas Fabri, 06/06/2018
- Re: [cgal-discuss] C++ Standard, Raphael Grimm, 06/07/2018
- Re: [cgal-discuss] C++ Standard, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 06/07/2018
- Re: [cgal-discuss] C++ Standard, Andreas Fabri, 06/07/2018
- Re: [cgal-discuss] C++ Standard, Raphael Grimm, 06/07/2018
- Re: [cgal-discuss] C++ Standard, Andreas Fabri, 06/06/2018
- Re: [cgal-discuss] C++ Standard, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 06/06/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.