Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] hybrid 3D surface mesh generation

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] hybrid 3D surface mesh generation


Chronological Thread 
    < Chronological >      < Thread >
  • From: "F.A. Perez" <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] hybrid 3D surface mesh generation
  • Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 06:13:51 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=TSeBHQtlvcbqIs1z+IEyBSWTUm9QdnY3gfGprpU3EYE=; b=XyGf+oGf95ecP04TgSEHoXLwl/6BKiT0B0VqKEaJYzi1RDU2FNDfOtVjxbiIOfzWlS8H338vMhAKHhsUs8aasy4+qTbhAeKPWni1oYAkI7Id6pgPBXDWl1oKYNIn4p26xsSlDe+6YdBy3Me9VBkswXQehiF2i0zct5zJDlCp7wtMoTEhcMOjnrzqGNBXh63YuO3fqf0HFIx62gZjCwYiYLXN+fnDtzAHrm8bt3F+ODFgl99+KZnJOBGopd3naIChE2xdh8nxCOqlRef2Gy3lvOBY+XqM5LsJ2hqexiEAWMhqJlpTa249wDo3bQFf28b5p4wJ84hlKQouijYIAGFMuQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jcQiAUI7YI/0Q7MdkW07/InNTFmX/1+h9gjEfV+kVOhEQUthNT6Cu3BXlIgxG3q9WBZ5ZyDzWdXp5jAbxoYC2uTzBE4hLP+ujNaIZozX1CFc9GMWBmCrBD/be8MsCyEPI/VuENQpR5Fw9wuMo21xrpM8EfPepiyUIqvbQHrORrbYoqSp4Pd7D6iVQm5VazkzPDF5cfRk7e4TZ8NqBECK28hP1142azoNbhRLMDyvyzCJ3+bI+ibsRMjwOUMep0MU1qNOxZx1zSKHvD7nXXjcz8D8V7GgPGVtAb+TMeXCiQwW+H/QnE0L8Dxh6o+mXi6J/lb6rQLoeDqY4cK/7lDLmw==
  • Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=Pass ; spf=Pass
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:7qEeYBIIhXX4R1D95dmcpTZWNBhigK39O0sv0rFitYgXK/TzrarrMEGX3/hxlliBBdydt6sazbOM7+uwACQp2tWoiDg6aptCVhsI2409vjcLJ4q7M3D9N+PgdCcgHc5PBxdP9nC/NlVJSo6lPwWB6nK94iQPFRrhKAF7Ovr6GpLIj8Swyuu+54Dfbx9HiTagYL5+Ngi6oRveu8UZgoZuN7s6xwfUrHdPZ+lY335jK0iJnxb76Mew/Zpj/DpVtvk86cNOUrj0crohQ7BAAzsoL2465MvwtRneVgSP/WcTUn8XkhVTHQfI6gzxU4rrvSv7sup93zSaPdHzQLspVzmu87tnRRn1gyoBKjU38nzYitZogaxbvhyvugB/zYDXboGbNvVxYqzScMgASmZdQspcTTBNDp+iY4YJEuEPPfxYr474p1YWoxewBROgCf/1xjRVnHH5w7c63PogEA3IwQctGNcOsHXOoNrpM6cSS/q1w7fPzTnZc/NZxzL96JDPchA7u/6MWal9cc3MyUkzEwPFiVKQqY//MzyJ0eQNtnGW4ux9Xu2gl2ApsRt+oiSzxsgykInJgJoYxF/a+ChlwIg4J9y1RU17b9OkDJZdqz2XOYV2TM4gTW9ltjs2xqEHtJO1ciYH1pQpyR7RZfGacIWE/B3tWeSMLDp+mXlrdrW/hxOo/kihzO3xTtW70FlQoSpBiNXMsWoN1xPL5siGTPt95Eah1iyV2wDd8OFJJ10/m6nDK5M5zbM8ioAfvEDdEiPsmkj7g7Waelg49uS08+jrfK/pqoOBO4Jxlw3yL7kil8mhDuk3LgQCQ22W9Oai27H/4UL0RbBHg/I5n6TfrZvUP94UprSjDA9Qyosj6wiwDzOh0NkAkncIIk5LdA6IgoTwNV/DPf71Ae64g1u3jjhn3ffGPqD9AprWKXjDjbHhcqtn505E0gozysxf6IxIBbEdIfLzXUnxuMbfDh8kLwy0x+HnCNJ+1o8ERW2PBaqZPLvTsV+O+O0vP/GBaYAJtDrnL/Up+eTigH02lFMHYKWlwYcbZGi9Hvt8IkWZZXTsgs0GEWcPpgc+Se3qhEeeXj5UfXayRbwz5jYhBIK6E4jDQ5itgLub3CihGp1bfWdGCk2QEXfscIWEXPQMZDiOLc9mlzwITaKhRJM51RGyqA/6zKJqIfbb+iICsZLvzcV65+zIlR4u6Dx0FN+d3nqWT2B0m2MIXyU50Lp+oUx70FeD0LJ3j+ZWFdxJtLt0VBwnP8vc0/BiEIK1HRnQe8+ADlegWNSvRz8rCckgxscHJEd7FdLlhR/K22+mAqQeiqeQV6Ey6b/W/2T0I5N912rez/tmyEI3R9NGc2ygnK92sQbJQJXYll2Q0Kese6Nb1yHE8CKPzHGFoVpDAzN2SrjPYX0Peh7Wscjh/RGFCKS/DKwudApH08+LbKVQLcb4iE1PA/blNtOZaG24nyK8BA2D26iXP7btLi8W0yzZTUQFiAsO5m2uNA4kBy7nrXiURGhlGlvrJk/t6uJjs2iTT0kuzgjMYVc3hJSv/RtAz9LaYrVb5r8etTVr42FxHRC22MjMBt3GuwdkZKJGaNcV50pb0WXetEp2OZn2fPMqvUIXbwki5xCm7B5wEIgVyZF7/kNv9xJ7LOej6H0EcjqZ2Z7qPbiOcTv14QyrbKnVnFrZ1YTPo/td2LEDs1zm+TqROA866Xw+iItSzmeY4ZLJSgEVVMCpCxtlx11Bv7jfJxIFycbU2HlrbfbmnwL4g45sKMF+jxGqcpFYLb+OExL0H4sCHc+yJec2ml+vKBUZIORV861yNMSjJaKL
Dear Sebastien,

Thanks for the reply! I did consider this option but would this not still mean higer meshing times and memory use since I am still essentialy creating a volume mesh, albeit neglecting the quality of the inside mesh. Given that I expect meshing times to be in the order of days sometimes and with high memory use (especially if creating a volume mesh in the process) my hope was I could use the faster and less resource intensive 3d Surface mesher somehow. I am aware for speed I can go for parallel but the memory issue would remain. Or is the difference in memory use rather limited?

Regards,
Kim

From: <> on behalf of "Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)" <>
Sent: Monday, September 7, 2020 6:53 AM
To: <>
Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] hybrid 3D surface mesh generation
 
You can use the 3D mesher for that purpose. You can simply remove any
criteria on the tetrahedra and use
CGAL::facets_in_complex_3_to_triangle_mesh() to extract the surface facets:

https://doc.cgal.org/latest/Mesh_3/group__PkgMesh3Functions.html#ga68ca38989087644fb6b893eb566be9ea

Best,

Sebastien.

On 9/6/20 10:12 PM, "F.A. Perez" ( via
cgal-discuss Mailing List) wrote:
> Dear CGAL developers,
>
> I would like to use the 3D surface mesh generation capabilities of CGAL
> in a mode similar to the hybrid mode of the 3D mesh generator (i.e. use
> both an implicit domain and a polyhedral domain) but could not find
> anything about this being posible. Is there any way of achiving with the
> 3D surface mesher? The reason is I would like to provide a geometry
> given by a polyhedral domain with an infill given by an implicit domain.
>
> Kind regards,
> Kim
>
>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
> To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/info/cgal-discuss
>

--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/info/cgal-discuss



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page