coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: "Patricia Peratto" <pperatto AT hotmail.com>
- To: <coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>
- Subject: [Coq-Club] dependent types
- Date: Mon, 1 Jan 1996 20:37:03 -0300
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
I'm trying to define a rule for or_elim with
dependent types
as follows:
(A,B:Prop; P:(A\/B->Set))
((a:A)(P (or_introl A B a))) ->((b:B)(P (or_intror A B b)))->(p:(A\/B))(P p) with cases, but does not recognize p as
formed
by constructors and asks type (P p) for the
conclusion.
Is it not possible to define this rule in
Coq?
Regards
Patricia Peratto
|
- [Coq-Club] dependent types, Patricia Peratto
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent types,
Christine Paulin
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent types,
Patricia Peratto
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent types,
Christine Paulin
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent types, Benjamin Werner
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent types,
Christine Paulin
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent types,
Patricia Peratto
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent types,
Christine Paulin
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.