coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Pierre Courtieu <Pierre.Courtieu AT univ-orleans.fr>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Formal Methods and Coq
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:54:02 +0100
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:49:56 +0100
"Joseph N. Ruskiewicz"
<joseph.ruskiewicz AT inf.ethz.ch>
wrote:
> The approach that I will be taking will be from the B side and not
> the C/Java side.
>
> So, taking a formal method and then generating the proofs into Coq
> for proving.
Hi,
You mean you want to somehow use Coq to prove the proof obligations
generated by B (or another specif system)? I am not sure Why will be
directly helpful to you as it takes *programs* as input instead of
specifications.
A possible approach would be a translation from B specifs to axiomatically
defined coq functions (that may ultimately be implemented (and proved
correct) at the last refinement step). Exciting!
Cheers,
Pierre
- [Coq-Club] Formal Methods and Coq, Joseph N. Ruskiewicz
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formal Methods and Coq, jean-francois . monin
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formal Methods and Coq,
Jean-Christophe Filliatre
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formal Methods and Coq,
Eduardo Gimenez
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formal Methods and Coq,
Jean-Christophe Filliatre
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formal Methods and Coq,
Joseph N. Ruskiewicz
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formal Methods and Coq, Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formal Methods and Coq,
Joseph N. Ruskiewicz
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formal Methods and Coq,
Jean-Christophe Filliatre
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formal Methods and Coq,
Eduardo Gimenez
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.