coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: roconnor AT theorem.ca
- To: anoun AT labri.fr
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] constructor with arguments equality
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:49:42 -0500 (EST)
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005
anoun AT labri.fr
wrote:
> If we have a current goal of the form
> ============================
> c1 a1 a2 ..an=c1 b1 b2 ...bn
>
> Is there a direct tactic that simplifies this goal into n sub-goals ai=bi
> (i=1..n)
> ? Of course we can use the cut tactic n times,but it's not what I'm looking
> for,
> I need a generic tactic ...
I think adding such a tactic would be a good idea. I was looking to do
this sort of thing last week, but I just wrote myself a lemma.
--
Russell O'Connor <http://r6.ca/>
``All talk about `theft,''' the general counsel of the American Graphophone
Company wrote, ``is the merest claptrap, for there exists no property in
ideas musical, literary or artistic, except as defined by statute.''
- [Coq-Club] constructor with arguments equality, anoun
- Re: [Coq-Club] constructor with arguments equality, roconnor
- Re: [Coq-Club] constructor with arguments equality,
Xavier Leroy
- Re: [Coq-Club] constructor with arguments equality,
Thery Laurent
- Re: [Coq-Club] constructor with arguments equality,
anoun
- Re: [Coq-Club] constructor with arguments equality, Pierre Letouzey
- Re: [Coq-Club] constructor with arguments equality,
anoun
- Re: [Coq-Club] constructor with arguments equality,
Thery Laurent
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.