coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Jasper Stein <jasper AT codeyard.net>
- To: mulhern <mulhern AT gmail.com>
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club]Observation about auto and family
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:10:05 +0100
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
- Organization: CodeYard
Op zondag 29 januari 2006 17:14, schreef mulhern:
> But, it takes an unnecessarily long time. My proofs of the subgoals
> already exist in the exact form left after the induction step. Thus,
> "exact <proof1>" will always work when applied to subgoal1 and so
> forth.
There is also the tactic "assumption" which will look in your local context.
So instead of "auto" you might want to do "assumption; auto" to check for
hypotheses first, and then applying auto in case it doesn't solve it
immediately.
Jasper Stein (Team CodeYard)
--
(Vragen? Kijk op de website, of anders
info AT codeyard.net)
- [Coq-Club]Observation about auto and family, mulhern
- Re: [Coq-Club]Observation about auto and family, Jasper Stein
- Re: [Coq-Club]Observation about auto and family, Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club]Observation about auto and family, Jasper Stein
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.