Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club]Observation about auto and family

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club]Observation about auto and family


chronological Thread 
  • From: Jasper Stein <jasper AT codeyard.net>
  • To: mulhern <mulhern AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club]Observation about auto and family
  • Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:10:05 +0100
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
  • Organization: CodeYard

Op zondag 29 januari 2006 17:14, schreef mulhern:

> But, it takes an unnecessarily long time. My proofs of the subgoals
> already exist in the exact form left after the induction step. Thus,
> "exact <proof1>" will always work when applied to subgoal1 and so
> forth.

There is also the tactic "assumption" which will look in your local context. 
So instead of "auto" you might want to do "assumption; auto" to check for 
hypotheses first, and then applying auto in case it doesn't solve it 
immediately.


Jasper Stein (Team CodeYard)
-- 
(Vragen? Kijk op de website, of anders 
info AT codeyard.net)





Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page