Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club]eta-equivalence in Coq

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club]eta-equivalence in Coq


chronological Thread 
  • From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT cs.berkeley.edu>
  • To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club]eta-equivalence in Coq
  • Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 09:25:48 -0700
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>

roconnor AT theorem.ca
 wrote:

It seem that Coq ought to define -> to have kind type -> type -> type, and/or implement eta-equivalence.

So you want to define the type of -> in terms of itself? That sounds messy, and even more so since it is just syntactic sugar for 'forall'.





Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page