coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: S�bastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer AT loria.fr>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club]Decreasing arguments for fixpoint definitions
- Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:02:43 +0200
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Hi Adam,
> I wonder how one can persuade Coq that the Fixpoint definition is
> well-formed if the decrease of the argument is not completely obvious.
Have you tried well founded induction ?
Just grep for it in Coq's standard library.
I am sure Coq'art has nice examples illustrating how all this works.
Cheers,
Sébastien.
- [Coq-Club]Decreasing arguments for fixpoint definitions, Adam Koprowski
- Re: [Coq-Club]Decreasing arguments for fixpoint definitions, Sébastien Hinderer
- Re: [Coq-Club]Decreasing arguments for fixpoint definitions, jean-francois . monin
- Re: [Coq-Club]Decreasing arguments for fixpoint definitions,
David Pichardie
- Re: [Coq-Club]Decreasing arguments for fixpoint definitions, Adam Koprowski
- Re: [Coq-Club]Decreasing arguments for fixpoint definitions,
Adam Koprowski
- Re: [Coq-Club]Decreasing arguments for fixpoint definitions, David Pichardie
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.