coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: rcp AT Cs.Nott.AC.UK
- To: rcp AT Cs.Nott.AC.UK
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club]identical functions up to rewriting
- Date: 16 Feb 2007 10:12:34 +0000
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
- Source-info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.
That should be:
How can I prove the following two functions are the same (if at all)?
Lemma id_fin_fun: (fun (n:nat) (i: Fin n) => i) = (fun (n:nat) (i:Fin n) => rv n (rv n i).
Where rv (n:nat) : Fin n -> Fin n, and reverses the order of Fin n. There is a proof: forall (n:nat) (i: Fin n), rv n (rv n i) = i. When I use extensionality I get an error - "unbounded reference in environment".
Thanks,
RP.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
- [Coq-Club]identical functions up to rewriting, rcp
- Re: [Coq-Club]identical functions up to rewriting, Yevgeniy Makarov
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Coq-Club]identical functions up to rewriting, rcp
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.