coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Benjamin Pierce <bcpierce AT cis.upenn.edu>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Re: A simple explanation of simpl?
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:28:18 -0400
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
I am still puzzled about simpl. Let me ask my question from a few days ago again in more detail and see if anyone can enlighten me at least a little...
Here is the description of simpl from the reference manual:
This tactic applies to any goal. The tactic simpl first applies βι- reduction rule. Then it expands transparent constants and tries to reduce T' according, once more, to βι rules. But when the ι rule is not applicable then possible δ-reductions are not applied. For instance trying to use simpl on (plus n O)=n does change nothing.
I am not sure I follow all the nuances of the three critical sentences, but according to my understanding at least both of the following "Eval..." experiments should yield the same result -- they should both simplify completely (and yield 7) or neither should.
Definition plus' := plus.
Eval simpl in plus' 3 4.
Definition plus3 := plus 3.
Eval simpl in plus3 4.
But in fact the first goes to 7 while the plus3 in the second stays un-expanded. I would be most grateful for some intuition as to why this is.
Thanks,
- Benjamin
Begin forwarded message:
From: Benjamin Pierce
<bcpierce AT cis.upenn.edu>
Date: September 9, 2007 10:06:07 PM EDT
To:
coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
Subject: A simple explanation of simpl?
I am having a little trouble understanding the precise interplay between beta- and delta-reduction in the various simplification tactics...
Could someone explain why the first Eval yields 7 but the second does not?
Thanks!
- Benjamin
Definition plus' := plus.
Eval simpl in plus' 3 4.
Definition plus3 := plus 3.
Eval simpl in plus3 4.
- [Coq-Club] Re: A simple explanation of simpl?, Benjamin Pierce
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: A simple explanation of simpl?,
Hugo Herbelin
- RE: [Coq-Club] Re: A simple explanation of simpl?,
Georges Gonthier
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: A simple explanation of simpl?, Benjamin Pierce
- RE: [Coq-Club] Re: A simple explanation of simpl?,
Georges Gonthier
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: A simple explanation of simpl?,
Hugo Herbelin
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.