Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Two simple questions about coqdoc

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Two simple questions about coqdoc


chronological Thread 
  • From: Edsko de Vries <devriese AT cs.tcd.ie>
  • To: Brian Aydemir <baydemir AT cis.upenn.edu>
  • Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Two simple questions about coqdoc
  • Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:21:19 +0100
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>

> > Try giving the --gallina (or -g for short) flag to coqdoc.  That  
> > should do what you want here.
> 
> Thanks for the quick reply. However, when I specify -g, definitions and
> fixpoints disappear along with the proofs.

Right, after some experimenting it turns out that coqdoc is thrown off
by the presence of non-Unix style line endings; when I run 

  coqdoc -g Proofs.v --latex && latex Proofs.tex

all sorts of stuff is missing from the output, but then when I run

  dos2unix Proofs.v

and re-generate the .tex file, everything works as expected.

Running gallina *does* work without converting line endings first. 

Thanks for the help,

Edsko





Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page