coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Frederic Blanqui <frederic.blanqui AT inria.fr>
- To: Julien Forest <forest AT ensiie.fr>, coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Proof irrelevance for le
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:24:25 +0800
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Please, see Lemma le_unique in http://color.loria.fr/, module Util/Nat/NatUtil.v.
Julien Forest a écrit :
Dear all, I wonder if one can manage to show proof irrelevance for le without
using any axiom nor importing ProofIrrelevance library.
At least, I want to be able to show that le is ProofIrrelevant enough
to be changed in the exist construtor.
Julien
--------------------------------------------------------
Bug reports: http://logical.futurs.inria.fr/coq-bugs
Archives: http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club
http://pauillac.inria.fr/bin/wilma/coq-club
Info: http://pauillac.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/coq-club
- [Coq-Club] Proof irrelevance for le, Julien Forest
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof irrelevance for le, Pierre Letouzey
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof irrelevance for le, Frederic Blanqui
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.