Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Guide to Coq Sources

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Guide to Coq Sources


chronological Thread 
  • From: "St�phane Lescuyer" <stephane.lescuyer AT polytechnique.org>
  • To: "Adam Chlipala" <adamc AT hcoop.net>
  • Cc: Cedric.Auger AT lri.fr, coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Guide to Coq Sources
  • Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:32:59 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=P9gONcntM56exYPqw6bnxR5mHgbDXG8D0XjwwJQDv7K16EgzZxgTlQbG8oGktFc2Vj IJWVg5tsA8Kzfd0QcrPKCP97SgDIgGaA4eYlmBVRzPAbDYZIPp695rl76nGQPP4q/0Lv y0EdQdzcmKKtONhgpXEefH3xJWgfFvE5WAi3g=
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>

Well, extraction is indeed tagged as 'experimental' in the
documentation, but it would agree with you nonetheless. I am actually
using extraction on a rather big Coq project and it works perfectly
(except a couple of glitches that were corrected by Pierre anyway).

Stéphane

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Adam Chlipala 
<adamc AT hcoop.net>
 wrote:
> AUGER Cédric wrote:
>>
>> Extraction is still experimental
>
> Really?  I've been thinking of it as one of the most core, well-established
> features of Coq.  I've used it since 7.something.
>
> Is there some new reimplementation that might have introduced regression
> bugs?
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Bug reports: http://logical.futurs.inria.fr/coq-bugs
> Archives: http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club
>         http://pauillac.inria.fr/bin/wilma/coq-club
> Info: http://pauillac.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/coq-club
>



-- 
I'm the kind of guy that until it happens, I won't worry about it. -
R.H. RoY05, MVP06





Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page