coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Matthieu Sozeau <Matthieu.Sozeau AT lri.fr>
- To: Nadeem Abdul Hamid <nadeem AT acm.org>
- Cc: Coq Club <coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Finding opaque dependencies
- Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:57:20 -0500
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Hi Nadeem,
Le 7 mars 09 à 19:15, Nadeem Abdul Hamid a écrit :
I have a somewhat complicated fixpoint function that's been defined using Program, but in some parts of its definition I think I've ended up using opaque lemmas from the FSets library, so in certain cases the function doesn't reduce nicely to a simple result when I apply [compute]. So:
- is there any easy way in general to determine what opaque definitions might have been used?
There's no way to do it yet. We should definitely have a "Print Opaque Dependencies"
to supplement "Print Assumptions". Consider it done!
-- Matthieu
- [Coq-Club] Finding opaque dependencies, Nadeem Abdul Hamid
- Re: [Coq-Club] Finding opaque dependencies, Matthieu Sozeau
- Re: [Coq-Club] Finding opaque dependencies, Nadeem Abdul Hamid
- Re: [Coq-Club] Finding opaque dependencies,
Adam Koprowski
- Re: [Coq-Club] Finding opaque dependencies, Matthieu Sozeau
- Re: [Coq-Club] Finding opaque dependencies, Matthieu Sozeau
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.