coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
Re: [Coq-Club] Adding (inductive) transitivity to weak bisimilarity not sound? (was: Need help with coinductive proof)
chronological Thread
- From: Nils Anders Danielsson <nad AT Cs.Nott.AC.UK>
- To: Coq Club <coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>, Agda List <agda AT lists.chalmers.se>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Adding (inductive) transitivity to weak bisimilarity not sound? (was: Need help with coinductive proof)
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 01:20:21 +0100
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
On 2009-08-28 18:35, Edsko de Vries wrote:
would Agda accept it?
Yes, the following relation is trivial:
data _∼_ : PCoℕ → PCoℕ → Set where
zero : zero ∼ zero
suc : ∀ {m n} (m∼n : ∞ (♭ m ∼ ♭ n)) → suc m ∼ suc n
τ : ∀ {m n} (m∼n : ∞ (♭ m ∼ ♭ n)) → τ m ∼ τ n
τˡ : ∀ {m n} (m∼n : ♭ m ∼ n ) → τ m ∼ n
τʳ : ∀ {m n} (m∼n : m ∼ ♭ n ) → m ∼ τ n
-- Transitivity.
_∼⟨_⟩_ : ∀ n₁ {n₂ n₃}
(n₁∼n₂ : n₁ ∼ n₂) (n₂∼n₃ : n₂ ∼ n₃) → n₁ ∼ n₃
-- Reflexivity.
_∎ : ∀ n → n ∼ n
trivial : ∀ m n → m ∼ n
trivial m n =
m ∼⟨ τʳ (m ∎) ⟩
τ (♯ m) ∼⟨ τ (♯ trivial m n) ⟩
τ (♯ n) ∼⟨ τˡ (n ∎) ⟩
n ∎
--
/NAD
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
- Re: [Coq-Club] Adding (inductive) transitivity to weak bisimilarity not sound? (was: Need help with coinductive proof), Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] Adding (inductive) transitivity to weak bisimilarity not sound? (was: Need help with coinductive proof), Nils Anders Danielsson
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.