Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - [Coq-Club] about Tactic Notation: a variant of apply ... with ...

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

[Coq-Club] about Tactic Notation: a variant of apply ... with ...


chronological Thread 
  • From: Gyesik Lee <gslee AT ropas.snu.ac.kr>
  • To: Coq Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: [Coq-Club] about Tactic Notation: a variant of apply ... with ...
  • Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:50:32 +0900
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=o986KSkGL2L/+NfXNgaYkcB8ddp6VOf2nIopGGPX7n93C3G/5IV0nlL2HSvZhw8PGH K4yOaSXBlGCgGs9rzVxNumFHf6JukYW5ditIro61s+rpiwsjgvRLWo0k/D5dQa6UtQ1E Fs7oRTC9QYBik/qv2GOKOu7vWRjegU6t+NEr0=

Hi,

How can I write a tactic with a binding list as in the case of "apply
... with ..." ?

I am wondering which tactic argument can be used in the following example 
case:

Tactic Notation "papply" constr(H) "with" ???(a:=x)
  := simpl; apply H with (a:=x)

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Gyesik



Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page