coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Gyesik Lee <gslee AT ropas.snu.ac.kr>
- To: Coq Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: [Coq-Club] about Tactic Notation: a variant of apply ... with ...
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:50:32 +0900
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=o986KSkGL2L/+NfXNgaYkcB8ddp6VOf2nIopGGPX7n93C3G/5IV0nlL2HSvZhw8PGH K4yOaSXBlGCgGs9rzVxNumFHf6JukYW5ditIro61s+rpiwsjgvRLWo0k/D5dQa6UtQ1E Fs7oRTC9QYBik/qv2GOKOu7vWRjegU6t+NEr0=
Hi,
How can I write a tactic with a binding list as in the case of "apply
... with ..." ?
I am wondering which tactic argument can be used in the following example
case:
Tactic Notation "papply" constr(H) "with" ???(a:=x)
:= simpl; apply H with (a:=x)
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Gyesik
- [Coq-Club] about Tactic Notation: a variant of apply ... with ..., Gyesik Lee
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] about Tactic Notation: a variant of apply ... with ...,
Gyesik Lee
- Re: [Coq-Club] about Tactic Notation: a variant of apply ... with ..., AUGER Cédric
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] about Tactic Notation: a variant of apply ... with ..., AUGER Cedric
- Re: [Coq-Club] about Tactic Notation: a variant of apply ... with ...,
Gyesik Lee
- Message not available
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.