coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Gregory Bush <gbush AT mysck.com>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Do I need JMeq?
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:07:17 -0500
(* This may be trivial, but is the following provable in Coq without using JMeq_eq or other axioms? *)
Set Implicit Arguments.
Variable M : Type -> Type.
Variable R : forall A, M A -> M A -> Prop.
Inductive R' : forall A B, M A -> M B -> Prop :=
| CR' : forall A (x y : M A), R x y -> R' x y.
Theorem R'inv : forall A (x y : M A), R' x y -> R x y.
(* Thanks *)
- [Coq-Club] Do I need JMeq?, Gregory Bush
- Re: [Coq-Club] Do I need JMeq?,
Alexandre Pilkiewicz
- Re: [Coq-Club] Do I need JMeq?,
AUGER Cedric
- Re: [Coq-Club] Do I need JMeq?, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Do I need JMeq?, Gregory Bush
- Re: [Coq-Club] Do I need JMeq?,
AUGER Cedric
- Re: [Coq-Club] Do I need JMeq?,
Alexandre Pilkiewicz
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.