coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
[Coq-Club] Should eauto progress leaving non-instantiated existential variables?
chronological Thread
- From: Paolo Herms <paolo.herms AT inria.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Should eauto progress leaving non-instantiated existential variables?
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:20:09 +0100
Hello,
I've got a real example which reduces to this one:
Definition True2 := True.
Definition def (u:unit) (P: Prop) := P.
Lemma lem u: def u True -> True2.
auto.
Save.
Hint Unfold def.
Hint Resolve lem.
Goal True2.
eauto.
Fail Save.
I think the call to eauto shouldn't do anything here, as it cannot completely
solve the goal. Or are there situations where you want this behaviour?
--
Paolo Herms
PhD Student - CEA Software Safety Lab. / INRIA ProVal Project
Paris, France
- [Coq-Club] Should eauto progress leaving non-instantiated existential variables?, Paolo Herms
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.