coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Pierre Courtieu <Pierre.Courtieu AT cnam.fr>
- To: Georges Gonthier <gonthier AT microsoft.com>
- Cc: Vincent Siles <vincent.siles AT ens-lyon.org>, Coq-Club Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] strange behaviour of Coq / Proof General
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:22:33 +0100
2012/1/16 Georges Gonthier
<gonthier AT microsoft.com>:
> Because the (ssreflect) library defines the composite symbol ./2. Without
> that definition Coq parses Eval compute in (3). then sees a lone / 2 whence
> the syntax error. The PG segmentation sends the entire fragment in one
> piece to Coq, expecting a single answer. I guess Coq could follow the same
> policy and only recognize . + whitespace as the end-of-command marker,
> though this might not suit users that string many commands on the same
> line.
Up to bugs :), pg recognizes only .+spaces as the end of command (and
also the new bullets since very recent dev releases). In pg4.1 and pg
dev release (the latter recommended for coq-8.4beta) I cannot
reproduce this behavior. Hopefully this is an already fixed bug :).
Please let me know if you still have the bug.
Best regards,
Pierre
- [Coq-Club] strange behaviour of Coq / Proof General, Vincent Siles
- RE: [Coq-Club] strange behaviour of Coq / Proof General,
Georges Gonthier
- Re: [Coq-Club] strange behaviour of Coq / Proof General, Vincent Siles
- Re: [Coq-Club] strange behaviour of Coq / Proof General, Pierre Courtieu
- RE: [Coq-Club] strange behaviour of Coq / Proof General,
Georges Gonthier
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.