coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Pierre Casteran <pierre.casteran AT labri.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Re: question about simulation relation
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:47:19 +0100
Hi Lisa,
You may have a look at the module Logic.ClassicalEpsilon, which allows you to use Hilbert's Choice operator.
Best,
Pierre
Do you mean that we could use "choice_axiom" to handle the "exists" so that
the
proof can go on? If we take (trace->trace) for A and trace for B, how can we
construct R?
Axiom choice_axiom:forall (A B : Type) (R : A->B->Prop),
(forall x : A, exists y : B, R x y) ->
exists f : A->B, (forall x : A, R x (f x)).
Thank you very much!
- [Coq-Club] question about simulation relation, ldou
- Re: [Coq-Club] question about simulation relation,
Pierre-Marie Pédrot
- [Coq-Club] Re: question about simulation relation,
lisa
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: question about simulation relation, Pierre Casteran
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: question about simulation relation, Daniel Schepler
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: question about simulation relation, Pierre Casteran
- [Coq-Club] Re: question about simulation relation,
lisa
- Re: [Coq-Club] question about simulation relation, Thomas Dinsdale-Young
- Re: [Coq-Club] question about simulation relation,
Pierre-Marie Pédrot
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.