Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Re: question about simulation relation

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Re: question about simulation relation


chronological Thread 
  • From: Pierre Casteran <pierre.casteran AT labri.fr>
  • To: coq-club AT inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Re: question about simulation relation
  • Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:47:19 +0100

Hi Lisa,

You may have a look at the module Logic.ClassicalEpsilon, which allows you to use Hilbert's Choice operator.

Best,

Pierre



Do you mean that we could use "choice_axiom" to handle the "exists" so that 
the
proof can go on? If we take (trace->trace) for A and trace for B, how can we
construct R?
Axiom choice_axiom:forall (A B : Type) (R : A->B->Prop),
    (forall x : A, exists y : B, R x y) ->
     exists f : A->B, (forall x : A, R x (f x)).
Thank you very much!






Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page