coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
Re: [Coq-Club] Simple demonstration that the type hierarchy is needed for consistency?
chronological Thread
- From: Daniel Schepler <dschepler AT gmail.com>
- To: Randy Pollack <rpollack0 AT gmail.com>
- Cc: Coq Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Simple demonstration that the type hierarchy is needed for consistency?
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 02:17:35 -0700
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Randy Pollack
<rpollack0 AT gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hurken's paradox, TLCA 1995.
Umm, could you be more specific? When I tried a Google search on
those terms, all I got was some random Agda patch where "Hurken's
paradox" was just by itself in the middle with no context. And afaict
HurkensParadox.v in the Coq source would require something like
Axiom classicT : forall {X:Type}, X + (X -> False).
--
Daniel Schepler
- [Coq-Club] Simple demonstration that the type hierarchy is needed for consistency?, Daniel Schepler
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple demonstration that the type hierarchy is needed for consistency?,
Randy Pollack
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple demonstration that the type hierarchy is needed for consistency?, Daniel Schepler
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple demonstration that the type hierarchy is needed for consistency?, Chad E Brown
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple demonstration that the type hierarchy is needed for consistency?,
Randy Pollack
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.