coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Type-Checking partial proofs
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 03:02:30 -0400
Hi,
I'm trying to diagnose an "Illegal application (Type Error)" that I get on [Qed]. I'm pretty sure it comes from an implicit coercion or from a [rewrite] or from [reflexivity], but I'm not sure. Is there a way to ask Coq to see if the proof built up so far type-checks? I can use [admit. Qed.], but this only works if there are no remaining existential variables.
Thanks.
-Jason
- [Coq-Club] Type-Checking partial proofs, Jason Gross, 06/29/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] Type-Checking partial proofs, Pierre-Marie Pédrot, 06/29/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] Type-Checking partial proofs, Adam Chlipala, 06/29/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] Type-Checking partial proofs, Paolo Herms, 06/29/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] Type-Checking partial proofs, Vladimir Voevodsky, 06/29/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.