Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - [Coq-Club] Re: [TYPES] a question

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

[Coq-Club] Re: [TYPES] a question


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Vladimir Voevodsky <vladimir AT ias.edu>
  • To: types-list AT lists.seas.upenn.edu, Coq Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Cc: Vladimir Voevodsky <vladimir AT ias.edu>
  • Subject: [Coq-Club] Re: [TYPES] a question
  • Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:58:08 -0400
  • Envelope-to: types-list AT lists.seas.upenn.edu, coq-club AT inria.fr, vladimir AT ias.edu

Many thanks to everybody who provided suggestions on my, not so well
formulated, question.

It appears to me now after more thinking and some Wikipedia searches :), that
the system which I had in mind is equivalent to Primitive Recursive
Arithmetic and, as I have been told, the provability of sentences in this
system is undecidable.

Vladimir.





On Jul 19, 2012, at 10:43 AM, Vladimir Voevodsky wrote:

> [ The Types Forum, http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-list ]
>
> Hello,
>
> does any one know if the system of natural arithmetic with equality,
> addition, multiplication, exponentiation (or without exponentiation),
> "forall" quantifier, implication and conjunction is decidable? There is no
> existential quantifier and no negation.
>
> Thanks!
> Vladimir.
>
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page